ANN039

Those Disappointed in the Messiah Jesus

This article discusses how Jesus disappointed some of his disciples because they expected the Messiah to be a political liberator rather than a spiritual savior.

21 min disappointment Messiah Jesus expectations Capernaum discourse 28 verses 12 books

For more information

Introduction

There is a universal and timeless principle: when we place our expectations on a charismatic figure, we risk being disappointed. We project onto these exceptional men or women our deepest aspirations, our dreams, and sometimes even our frustrations.

We look at them not as they are, but as we would like them to be. When reality is revealed, the gap between our hope and the truth can provoke deep disappointment, even rejection.

The authors of the Gospels did not hesitate to report episodes in which this phenomenon appears clearly. One of the most striking is found in the Gospel of John.

I. The Capernaum discourse: an unexpected break

After a teaching given in the of Capernaum, Jesus speaks of salvation through his death, using the image of “eating his flesh” and “drinking his blood.” This language was hard for an uninitiated listener to understand. Yet the Jews were well acquainted with the notion of sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins (Leviticus 17.11). Even so, his words cause a shock.

John 6.60-61 (King James Version) :
Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?

Jesus perceives their murmuring and their offense. The result is immediate:

John 6.66 (King James Version) :
From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

These are not mere sympathizers here, but regular disciples, men and women who had walked with him, seen his miracles and heard his teaching. Their departure is so massive that Jesus turns to the Twelve:

John 6.67 (King James Version) :
Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away?

reveals the fundamental difference between those who stay and those who leave:

John 6.68-69 (King James Version) :
Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God.

Those who abandon Jesus are disappointed because they were expecting something else. They had projected onto him their own messianic ideal. Peter, for his part, understands that Jesus’ mission goes beyond their human expectations: it touches eternal life.

II. Messianic expectations in first-century Judaism

To understand why so many Jews were disappointed by Jesus, it is essential to grasp what the messianic expectations were in the first century. Judaism at that time was not uniform: several currents coexisted, each nurturing a particular vision of the Messiah. However, one thing united them: all awaited a decisive intervention of God in the history of Israel.

1. An explosive political context

For nearly a century, Israel had lived under Roman domination. This occupation was felt as a national and spiritual humiliation. The people remembered the promises made to Abraham, to Moses and to David, and ardently hoped for a restoration of Israel’s sovereignty.

The prophets had announced a reign of peace, justice and divine power:

  • A king descended from David (2 Samuel 7.12-16)
  • A universal reign of peace (Isaiah 9.6-7)
  • A restoration of Israel among the nations (Amos 9.11-12)

In this context, many were waiting for a political, military and royal Messiah, able to overthrow Rome and restore the glory of Israel.

2. The different messianic expectations

a) The royal Messiah (son of David)

This was the most widespread expectation: a powerful king, like David, who would free Israel from its enemies. This vision rested on texts such as:

  • “A shoot will come out of the stump of Jesse…” (Isaiah 11.1-10)
  • “Behold, your king comes to you…” (Zechariah 9.9-10)

Many saw in Jesus a possible candidate, especially after his miracles (John 6.14-15).

b) The priestly Messiah (son of Aaron)

Certain groups, notably the of , expected two Messiahs: a royal Messiah and a priestly Messiah. The priestly Messiah was to purify worship, restore the holiness of the people and prepare for the coming of God’s reign.

c) The prophet like Moses

Others awaited a new Moses, in accordance with the promise:

“I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers…”
(Deuteronomy 18.15-18)

This Messiah was to teach the Law, perform mighty signs and lead the people into a new deliverance.

d) The military liberator Messiah

Certain Zealot movements hoped for a military leader who would lead an armed revolt against Rome. This vision relied on figures such as Gideon, Judas Maccabeus or, later, Bar Kokhba. In this perspective, the Messiah was to be a conqueror.

3. A suffering Messiah: an idea hard to accept

Although the Scriptures clearly announce a suffering Messiah, notably in the Servant of Isaiah:

  • “Despised and rejected by men…” (Isaiah 53.3-5)
  • “He bore our sins…” (Isaiah 53.10-12)

This dimension was largely misunderstood or ignored. A crucified Messiah was inconceivable:

“We preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews…”
(1 Corinthians 1.23)

4. Jesus: a Messiah who defies every expectation

Jesus fulfills the prophecies, but not according to human categories:

  • He refuses political kingship (John 6.15).
  • He announces a spiritual kingdom (Luke 17.20-21).
  • He preaches love for enemies (Matthew 5.44).
  • He enters Jerusalem humbly, on a colt (Zechariah 9.9; Matthew 21.4-5).
  • He speaks of his death as a necessary passage (Mark 8.31).

His messianic identity did not match popular expectations. He had not come to free Israel from Rome, but to free humanity from sin.

III. The disciples of Emmaus: the bitterness of shattered hope

The same principle appears in the two disciples on the road to Emmaus. It is Sunday, April 3, AD 33, three days after the crucifixion. Their sadness is palpable:

Luke 24.21 (King James Version) :
But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.

The verb “we had hoped” says it all: their vision of the Messiah was political, national and earthly. They expected a liberator like the judges of the Old Testament. Their disappointment is so strong that it prevents them from recognizing the risen Jesus walking at their side. Yet it is precisely to them that Jesus will explain, “beginning with Moses and all the Prophets,” that the Messiah had to suffer before entering into his glory (Luke 24.25-27).

IV. Judas Iscariot: a disappointment that leads to betrayal

It is reasonable to consider that Judas was driven by a similar disappointment. Many Jews found the hard to bear and awaited a conquering Messiah. Judas, a witness of Jesus’ miracles, perhaps hoped for a national uprising. But Jesus consistently refuses the political path:

  • He flees when people want to make him king (John 6.15).
  • He declares that his kingdom “is not of this world” (John 18.36).
  • He teaches love for enemies (Matthew 5.44).

To a nationalist mind, these words could be incomprehensible, even unbearable. Judas’s disappointment, fed by an erroneous messianic project, may have contributed to his betrayal.

Conclusion

The nationalist sentiment was deeply rooted in the minds of many Jews of the first century. They awaited a warrior Messiah, a political liberator. When Jesus performs miracles, many think that all the conditions are met for a national restoration:

John 3.2 (King James Version) :
The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

But when Jesus is crucified, hope collapses. The disappointment is immense, matching the expectation. The disciples of Emmaus, Judas Iscariot and so many others were disappointed not because Jesus failed, but because they had imagined another plan.

In reality, it is not Jesus who disappointed them: it is their own project, personal and selfish, that did not come to pass. Jesus was never an instrument in their hands. He is God come to bring salvation, not according to human expectations, but according to the purpose:

John 3.16-17 (King James Version) :
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.