PER188

Peter’s second declaration

The article deals with Peter’s second declaration, in which he recognizes Jesus as the Messiah. It examines the biblical accounts that place this event at Caesarea Philippi, emphasizing the difficulty for a Jewish audience to accept divine sonship. Jesus asks his disciples not to declare his messiahship openly.

6 min Peter Messiah Jesus divine sonship Caesarea Philippi 6 verses 3 books

Resources

Biblical texts

Matthew
Matthew 16.13-16 (King James Version)

When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.

He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

Mark
Mark 8.27-30 (King James Version)

And Jesus went out, and his disciples, into the towns of Cæsarea Philippi: and by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do men say that I am?

And they answered, John the Baptist: but some say, Elias; and others, One of the prophets.

And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Peter answereth and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ.

And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.

Luke
Luke 9.18-21 (King James Version)

And it came to pass, as he was alone praying, his disciples were with him: and he asked them, saying, Whom say the people that I am?

They answering said, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others say, that one of the old prophets is risen again.

He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, The Christ of God.

And he straitly charged them, and commanded them to tell no man that thing;

John
John (King James Version) not cited in the book

Technical details

Year AD 32

Location: Caesarea Philippi

Date: August

Method: We continue with Mark

Note on the method: Matthew and Luke confirm this fact

Map of Caesarea Philippi

The Messiah Jesus asks his disciples what people say about Him.

Peter’s second declaration

Peter’s second declaration

Comments

Matthew and Mark place this account in the villages near Caesarea Philippi, located at the foot of Mount Hermon in northern Galilee. This is where the Jordan has its main source. This city must not be confused with Caesarea, situated on the shores of the Mediterranean.

The Messiah Jesus, accompanied by his disciples, undertook a journey of about 45 km northward to evangelize the villages of this region.

Luke reports that the Messiah Jesus and his disciples were in a secluded place, probably a mountain such as Mount Hermon. It seems that He was praying alone while the disciples stood at a distance.

All three authors record this question from the Master, important in their eyes: Who am I, according to people, I the Son of Man?

How did the crowd perceive the Messiah Jesus?

The result is disappointing despite the honorific titles attributed, and only Peter gives the expected answer: “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” It seems that various peoples who witnessed Jesus’ miracles do not recognize him as the Messiah announced by the prophets.

Matthew alone specified in his text: the Son of the living God, yet he is addressing Jews, who do not understand and above all do not accept that God could have a Son! It seems that Matthew’s aim was to challenge the preconceived idea that God cannot have a son. The concept of the Trinity nevertheless remains complex to grasp.

In his Gospel, Matthew is the only one to use the expression “the Son of the living God.” This detail fits a particular context, in which the author addresses a Jewish audience for whom the idea of divine sonship remains difficult to conceive and to accept. It thus seems that Matthew’s aim was to challenge established conceptions, opening a reflection on the theological possibility of a filial relationship between God and Jesus. However, the doctrine of the Trinity remains a complex notion, requiring an in-depth approach to fully grasp its theological and philosophical implications.

The Master’s instruction not to proclaim his messiahship, which we find in Mark 8.30 and Luke 9.21, may seem surprising. We find this statement in Matthew 16.20. Was this not what He expected? He wished that the crowd, by observing the miracles He performed, would recognize his messiahship without any need to announce it explicitly.

The messiahship of Jesus should be evident to everyone, given that no one else could have performed the miracles He accomplished. However, it was under the influence of the Holy Spirit that Peter proclaimed him Messiah. Thus it is essential that divine power act directly on the so that it may understand the true identity of the Messiah Jesus.