The difference between the accounts of Matthew 20.29-34, Mark 10.46-52 and Luke 18.35-43 regarding the number of blind men mentioned has sparked much discussion among biblical scholars. Here are some possible explanations:
Comparison of the events
Matthew 20.29-34: Mentions two blind men sitting by the roadside, both healed by Jesus the Messiah.
Mark 10.46-52 and Luke 18.35-43: Mention only one blind man, named Bartimaeus in Mark, but both place the miracle as Jesus leaves Jericho (Mark and Matthew) or as he approaches Jericho (Luke).
Possible explanations
Focus on Bartimaeus: Mark and Luke may have chosen to focus on the most notable blind man, identified as Bartimaeus in Mark. This focus could be due to his specific role or to his recognition in the early Christian community.
Theological meaning: Matthew, who often strives to demonstrate the importance and completeness of events for his Jewish readers, may have mentioned two blind men in order to reinforce the truthfulness and impact of this miracle.
Conclusion
It is commonly accepted that these accounts refer to the same event, despite differences in detail. These variations illustrate the richness and diversity of the Gospel testimonies, each author bringing a unique perspective while relating key events from the life and ministry of Jesus the Messiah.
Each author selects the aspects of the events that serve his specific purpose. They provide only part of the truth, so that only the synthesis of the different texts relating to the same event gives a more accurate picture of what took place.
Ultimately, the central message remains unchanged: the compassion and healing power of Jesus the Messiah, and the faith of the blind men desperately seeking his help.